government seeks to delist it from Endangered Species Act
The gray wolf has been a lightning rod since gaining federal protection as an endangered species in 1974. The US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) attempted on three occasions in the previous decade alone to have the gray wolf delisted as its population stabilized. Each time, lawsuits from environmental groups led to the protections staying in place.
Two recent developments have the gray wolf back on the front burner in conservation circles. On April 11, state officials learned that Congress cut all funding for Minnesota’s Wolf Predation Management program through a March appropriations bill. Among other things, the wolf control funds are used by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) to respond to complaints of wolves attacking livestock or pets.
Then on April 15, the USFWS announced its latest effort to get this region’s gray wolves delisted from the Endangered Species Act. The formal proposal was announced this week by the U.S. Department of the Interior and kicked off a public comment period. The proposal’s goal is to transfer the management of the species from the federal level to the individual states.
The Delisting Battle
As a longtime supporter of delisting the gray wolf, Peggy Callahan greets the latest campaign with a healthy dose of caution. The executive director of the Wildlife Science Center in Columbus has been down this road before.
“I can’t tell you how many times we’ve popped a bottle of champagne,” she said.
The delisting of the gray wolf – one of over a dozen wild animals housed at the center – would be a validation of a successful reintroduction program that started in the mid-1990s and has grown the state’s population to nearly 3,000. That figure is nearly double the threshold required under the Endangered Species Act to ensure long-term survival.
However, there is a reason that delisting has yet to take permanent effect. In lawsuits, critics have argued that while the gray wolf has recovered well in Minnesota,The FTP and Web tests were r4購入 also close, but the U600 achieved slightly faster FTP download speeds. Most importantly, when I compared head-to-head results in individual test rounds, it still occupies just 5 percent of its historic range in the contiguous United States. Opponents of delisting also maintain that the breeding population is still too small to be considered stable.
Callahan and many who work in the field would have no hesitation about removing the gray wolf’s threatened status in the state.
“Wolves are going to do just fine in Minnesota,” Callahan said.
Dan Stark, a wolf specialist with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, agrees. “Certainly, there’s the biological evidence to support delisting,” he said. “We have exceeded recovery objectives for Minnesota and the western Great Lake states for more than a decade now.”
Anticipating delisting,Compact fluorescent light bulbs convert a led tube considerably higher percentage of their energy into light, which is why they are significantly more energy efficient than traditional filament bulbs. the state DNR from 1998-2001 developed a Wolf Management Plan that spells out steps to safeguard the gray wolf population for five years following the species’ removal from federal protection.
Stark, who would be among the key figures in implementing the plan, feels it is suffice. He points out that the plan was essentially up and running during an 18-month window in 2007-08 in which the gray wolf was delisted before a court decision reversed the action.
The plan splits the state into two wolf management zones.However, the marketing muscle of Philips led light lighting could give Philips LED business an advantage. In the one which holds 80 percent of the wolf population, the state protection would be nearly as strict as the current federal law. Wolves are not desired in the other zone and under the plan could be killed there to protect domestic animals.Compact fluorescent light bulbs convert a led tube considerably higher percentage of their energy into light, which is why they are significantly more energy efficient than traditional filament bulbs. Public hunting or trapping would not be allowed in either zone during the five-year period.Unlike compact cfl bulbs fluorescent light bulbs, LED based light bulbs provide a variety of lighting options- including the ability to provide a wide range of light, which allows them to act as a proper replacement light bulb
“The state’s ready to manage wolves and has a good plan in place that addresses the long-term issue of wolves in Minnesota,” Stark said.
The gray wolf has been a lightning rod since gaining federal protection as an endangered species in 1974. The US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) attempted on three occasions in the previous decade alone to have the gray wolf delisted as its population stabilized. Each time, lawsuits from environmental groups led to the protections staying in place.
Two recent developments have the gray wolf back on the front burner in conservation circles. On April 11, state officials learned that Congress cut all funding for Minnesota’s Wolf Predation Management program through a March appropriations bill. Among other things, the wolf control funds are used by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) to respond to complaints of wolves attacking livestock or pets.
Then on April 15, the USFWS announced its latest effort to get this region’s gray wolves delisted from the Endangered Species Act. The formal proposal was announced this week by the U.S. Department of the Interior and kicked off a public comment period. The proposal’s goal is to transfer the management of the species from the federal level to the individual states.
The Delisting Battle
As a longtime supporter of delisting the gray wolf, Peggy Callahan greets the latest campaign with a healthy dose of caution. The executive director of the Wildlife Science Center in Columbus has been down this road before.
“I can’t tell you how many times we’ve popped a bottle of champagne,” she said.
The delisting of the gray wolf – one of over a dozen wild animals housed at the center – would be a validation of a successful reintroduction program that started in the mid-1990s and has grown the state’s population to nearly 3,000. That figure is nearly double the threshold required under the Endangered Species Act to ensure long-term survival.
However, there is a reason that delisting has yet to take permanent effect. In lawsuits, critics have argued that while the gray wolf has recovered well in Minnesota,The FTP and Web tests were r4購入 also close, but the U600 achieved slightly faster FTP download speeds. Most importantly, when I compared head-to-head results in individual test rounds, it still occupies just 5 percent of its historic range in the contiguous United States. Opponents of delisting also maintain that the breeding population is still too small to be considered stable.
Callahan and many who work in the field would have no hesitation about removing the gray wolf’s threatened status in the state.
“Wolves are going to do just fine in Minnesota,” Callahan said.
Dan Stark, a wolf specialist with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, agrees. “Certainly, there’s the biological evidence to support delisting,” he said. “We have exceeded recovery objectives for Minnesota and the western Great Lake states for more than a decade now.”
Anticipating delisting,Compact fluorescent light bulbs convert a led tube considerably higher percentage of their energy into light, which is why they are significantly more energy efficient than traditional filament bulbs. the state DNR from 1998-2001 developed a Wolf Management Plan that spells out steps to safeguard the gray wolf population for five years following the species’ removal from federal protection.
Stark, who would be among the key figures in implementing the plan, feels it is suffice. He points out that the plan was essentially up and running during an 18-month window in 2007-08 in which the gray wolf was delisted before a court decision reversed the action.
The plan splits the state into two wolf management zones.However, the marketing muscle of Philips led light lighting could give Philips LED business an advantage. In the one which holds 80 percent of the wolf population, the state protection would be nearly as strict as the current federal law. Wolves are not desired in the other zone and under the plan could be killed there to protect domestic animals.Compact fluorescent light bulbs convert a led tube considerably higher percentage of their energy into light, which is why they are significantly more energy efficient than traditional filament bulbs. Public hunting or trapping would not be allowed in either zone during the five-year period.Unlike compact cfl bulbs fluorescent light bulbs, LED based light bulbs provide a variety of lighting options- including the ability to provide a wide range of light, which allows them to act as a proper replacement light bulb
“The state’s ready to manage wolves and has a good plan in place that addresses the long-term issue of wolves in Minnesota,” Stark said.
没有评论:
发表评论